REAFRA

P O Box 85
Arlington, MA 02476


Home Page

For Consumers
  Ralph Nader Statement
  MASSPIRG Testimony
  Homeowner Problems
  Consumer Issues
  Market Share Issues

For Agents
  Current Problems
  MABA Position
  Homeowner Problems
  Market Share Issues

Legal Problems
  Disguised Dual Agency
  Consumers Object
  Make Disclosures Understood
  R. E. Bar Association
  Legislative Issues
  Ralph Nader Statement
  Legal Opinion - Rounds
  Legal Opinion - Black
  Legal Opinion - Barry
  Legal Opinion - Perry
  Cleary Law Case
  Webster Law Case
  Dual Agency Greed
  Agency Common Law

Who WE Are
  Our Leaders
  Who We Are

Links of Interest

www.AgencyInformation.org

MORE PROBLEMS - MAR's AGENCY PROPOSAL

Designated Dual Agency, Non-Agency, and New Vicarious Liability Disclosures Create Confusion and Complications for REALTORs

To practice designated dual agency legally and ethically each agent in an office will need a firewall, a "Chinese wall" of protection around him or herself from every other agent in the office and also from the principal of the firm. It will require sophisticated and expensive legal advice to create the necessary labyrinth of procedures, disclosures, contracts, and consent agreements to safely establish this practice. These multiple and duplicative forms will create a "can of worms" and a lot of aggravation, rather than simplification or clarification. Individual agents will need their own secure offices or conference facilities, phones, files, fax, email, etc. The individual agent will undoubtedly take on more liability as the sole representative of their client. One can imagine the confusion, headaches and real liability concerns that will arise. The average agent today will need extensive training to attain the level of competence that will be required to credibly and safely offer these kinds of services. When you add the possibility of non-agency facilitation to this mix it becomes even more confusing. You have multiple representations and non-representations to clarify and keep straight for REALTORs who have found consistent seller agency challenging. Vicarious liability disclosure is already required for REALTORs and unnecessary to legislate.

Designated Dual Agency & Non-Agency Leads to Lower Fees

Homeowners will be disadvantaged in a system where only one agent will represent the homeowner's interest and the rest of the firm will represent the buyers' interests, trying to get the lowest possible price and most favorable terms for THEM. This simply does not give home sellers the full-office and firm-wide services that they are accustomed to and for which they are paying large commission amounts today. When sellers realize that the entire real estate office no longer represents them, they will begin to look for offices that offer discounted brokerage or they will go FSBO. We all will lose!

Designated Dual Agency Divides the Real Estate Office

Designated dual agency divides an office, with potentially just one individual listing agent designated to represent the seller, and all the rest of the agents in the office designated to represent buyers under various buyer-agency agreements. Buyers and sellers, who may be friends of their REALTOR, could get "appointed" to a REALTOR who they've never met or who may never have done a deal before. It is awkward and unnatural, especially in a small office. Also, to expect seller agents and buyer agents who share office space and friendships to keep all information compartmentalized and secret from each other is simply not realistic. Internal competition and negotiations can be very damaging to office moral over time and office policies that promote in-house sales may have to cease. This may explain why many offices in Maine and Connecticut, where designated agency is allowed, are not using it. (Reported by both states' REALTOR Board's Attorneys)

Designated Dual Agency & Non-Agency Cheapens REALTOR Image

Designated dual agency cheapens the real estate brokerage profession, by letting brokers follow much less stringent conflict-of-interest rules than have been required, always, for all law offices, all real estate offices, and, recently, for all investment-bankers and stock brokers. Instead of "all licensee's represent the seller, unless otherwise disclosed", all REALTORs represent whomever they want, even if they both work for the same DR/Broker who is advising both of them? "You can't serve two masters" is the cornerstone of agency. Dual agency makes REALTORs look more like a "used car salesman" with the latest sales gimmick.

Designated Dual Agency Disadvantages Small Firms

Finally, the proposed designated dual agency proposal favors the large corporate-run companies and discriminates against the many small, locally owned and family-run one- and two-person brokerage offices. Designated dual agency requires, by definition, at least three people in a local office: the office manager to do the designating, at least one person to represent the seller, and at least one person to represent the buyer. Sole proprietorships and two-person partnerships therefore could not take advantage of what our REALTOR organization is describing as an "opportunity". In fact it puts the small companies and 100% offices at a competitive disadvantage. Also, most small and midsize firms will not be able to afford the cumbersome structures and the legal advise and the training needed to establish this kind of practice.




HTML Copyright © 2003 mikron Computer Consultants, LLC
Published and maintained for REAFRA by
mikron Computer Consultants, LLC 508.432.4693